• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Anwar’s appeal dismissed

July 2, 2009

PUTRAJAYA, 2 July 2009: The Court of Appeal today dismissed an appeal by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to have his sodomy trial sent back to the Sessions Court from the High Court.

In a unanimous decision, it ruled that no member of the Executive, not even the prime minister, could interfere or fetter with the independent powers of the public prosecutor in respect of prosecutions.

Justice Datuk Abdull Hamid Embong, who led a three-member bench in hearing the appeal, said the prime minister was not the competent authority on matters concerning criminal prosecutions in the country.

“This authority is by virtue of Article 145(3) & (3A) of the Federal Constitution vested solely on the public prosecutor. All prosecutions are in his [or her] name as the representative of the state and public interest,” said Abdull Hamid.

He said the public prosecutor, who doubled as the Attorney-General, may be administratively answerable to the prime minister but certainly not in the area of prosecution, where the Federal Constitution and the public demanded that he or she be independent of any external interference or barriers.

He further held that the transfer certificate signed by Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail as the public prosecutor was valid under Section 418A of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) as he was only carrying out an administrative function when he signed it.

After the descision, Anwar, who was accompanied by his wife Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, said, “I am disgusted with the decision; it makes a mockery of our judiciary.”

Anwar, 62, was appealing against the High Court decision on 5 March which reversed the Sessions Court’s decision to retain his sodomy case at the Sessions Court.

He was charged with sodomising his former aide, 23-year-old Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan, at Unit 11-5-1, Desa Damansara Condominium, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara between 3.01 pm and 4.30 pm on 26 June 2008. On 18 June this year, a medical report by Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) has found no evidence of anal penetration of Saiful, raising doubts about the credibility of his charge against Anwar.

One of Anwar’s counsel, SN Nair, told the media that the defence team was considering filing for a review of today’s decision.

Abdull Hamid said then Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s assurance that Abdul Gani would not be personally involved in this case did not mean the public prosecutor be completely barred from exercising his functions in respects to prosecution.

Abdull Hamid, who presided over the hearing with justices Datuk Abu Samah Nordin and Datuk Jeffrey Tan Kok Wha, in a 17-page skeletal decision said Abdullah’s assurance meant that the public prosecutor (Abdul Gani) should no longer be seen to appear in Anwar’s sodomy proceedings.

“It could not be stretched to mean that the former prime minister intended to bar the public prosecutor from exercising his formal statutory functions, such as putting his signature on the transfer certificate,” he said. – Bernama

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Anwar Ibrahim, Court of Appeal, high court, Mohd Saiful, sodomy trial

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph