• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Chin Peng fails in last bid to enter M’sia

April 30, 2009

PUTRAJAYA, 30 April 2009: Former communist leader Chin Peng today failed in his last bid to live in Malaysia after the Federal Court here upheld two lower courts’ decisions compelling him to produce his identification documents before he can be permitted to enter this country.


Chin Peng (Pic extracted from the
cover of his book My Side of History,
published by Media Masters
Singapore, 2003)
Justices Datuk S Augustine Paul, Datuk Hashim Yusof and Datuk Wira Ghazali Mohd Yusof made the decision after dismissing Chin Peng’s motion for leave to appeal.

Chin Peng, whose real name is Ong Boon Hua, was appealing against the Appeal Court’s decision on 20 June 2008, which ruled that Chin Peng must produce his birth certificate or citizenship to prove that he is a Malaysian citizen before he can pursue his legal action against the Malaysian government.

Appeals Court Judge Datuk Abdul Malik Ishak, in his decision, had said the documents were important to ascertain Chin Peng’s status since the National Registration Department could not find any record of his birth.

It had also held that the High Court was correct to compel the 85-year-old Chin Peng to furnish his birth certificate and citizenship to prove that he was a Malaysian citizen before allowing him to proceed with his application for a declaration that he could reside here.

“Of Malaysian origin”

Chin Peng’s first bid to obtain the declaration was turned down when the High Court threw out his originating summons after he failed to comply with the court’s ruling to produce his birth certificate and citizenship papers.

Today, counsel Raja Aziz Addruse, for Chin Peng, contended that proof of citizenship was not required for the applicant to exercise his right to enter Malaysia, as it could also be proved by calling his brother or teacher to testify.

He said under clause 3(1) of the peace agreement entered between the government and the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) dated 2 Dec 1989, members of the CPM who were of Malaysian origin and wished to be settled in Malaysia shall be allowed to do so in accordance with the law.

“The court should look at what ‘Malaysian origin’ means. It is the function of this court to interpret the international agreement,” said Raja Aziz.

On 4 March 2005, Chin Peng filed his originating summons to obtain a declaration to be permitted to enter and live in Malaysia, naming the government, home minister, inspector-general of police and the armed forces chief as defendants.

Chin Peng, who is currently living in Thailand, claimed that he was entitled to come back to Malaysia because he is of Malaysian origin, having been born on 20 Oct 1923 in Sitiawan, Dinding, Perak, and having grown up in Malaysia.

He claimed that his birth was registered, and that he had once possessed a formal copy of the certificate. — Bernama

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Chin Peng, communist party, Federal Court, Malaysia

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Miaah says

    April 30, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    I don’t know why the Malaysian govertment is so afraid of letting Chin Peng return home. Do they think his return will forment insurrection?

  2. Andrew I says

    April 30, 2009 at 7:31 pm

    It was better to be red than dead once upon a time. Now, if you’re green (USD), you can live anywhere.

    In some places, you can even call it your second home.

  3. rosli says

    April 30, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    Miiah: If you think Chin Peng deserves to come home, please don’t put my name in the Welcome Home Committee.

    My great grandfather went missing after he was taken by the communist when the Bintang Tiga was in power for 14 days. I have an uncle who was shot in an ambush at Gopeng when serving as a special constable, and a classmate who lost her father in a shootout near Sg Siput.

  4. kimi says

    May 1, 2009 at 5:32 am

    Played out by the government.

    What’s the big problem about letting him back into the country.

    Another project by the BN government.

  5. Anak Kampung says

    May 1, 2009 at 2:32 pm

    I hear that the people from his own kampung and in Manjung (formerly Dindings) are not keen for him to come back as many people in there were killed during the insurgency. But perhaps it is time for forgiveness and reconciliation. And perhaps his coming back will help that.

  6. Lainie says

    May 1, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Ridiculous situation.

  7. beeyong says

    May 1, 2009 at 4:32 pm

    What irony. The whole world knows that he is the leader of the Malayan Communist Party and yet they refuse to believe he is a Malaysian, technically. The whole world already knows that there is only 1Malaysia all this while and yet they are “now” shouting 1Malaysia. Nothing to shout about.

  8. mythlord says

    May 2, 2009 at 9:02 am

    I don’t think the government is afraid of what Chin Peng might do. It’s more of what will be done to Chin Peng if he returns. I mean, he was responsible for a lot of bloodshed, and there are a lot of people who lost their family members during the communist insurrection that would not pass the chance to wring his neck the moment he’s on Malaysian soil.

  9. george of the jungle says

    May 2, 2009 at 9:47 am

    Augustine Paul, one of the most controversial judges in Malaysia, together with the government, are all outdated entities that need to be eliminated once and for all. Or else the country is doomed.

  10. Sanar says

    May 2, 2009 at 12:01 pm

    A FIGHTER FOR NATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION

    In spite of the decision of the court and the Malaysian government, if not for Chin Peng and his fighters, the British government would not have negotiated and the then Malaya would not have gained independence in 1957. Chin Peng and his comrades, more than anyone else, will be remembered in history for fighting the Japanese occupation, ending British colonialism and as fighters for national self-determination. No one can deny this historical truth.

  11. sklee says

    May 2, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    I am flabergasted that the judiciary is acting and behaving in this manner! Chin Peng’s identity can be easily eastablished as he has living relatives in Malaysia. If the reason is political, say so lah instead of acting [in this way] ……asking him to produce his IC/Birth Certificate when they have been confiscated and destroyed by the Colonial Government then. Where is the integrity? Did the government sign the Agreement? Doesn’t integrity count for more than mere political reason? Once again, the court is being used by the executive.

  12. Gopal Raj Kumar says

    May 3, 2009 at 7:34 am

    This is a former Victoria Institution Dux who ganged up and organised resistance to the Japanese in his MPAJA (Malayan People’s Anti-Japanese Army) in which my late father was a recruit and an active cadre till it became the MCP (Malayan Communist Party) after World War 2.

    Interestingly, Chin Peng and his guerilla army were accused of a number of atrocities including the Baling massacre which, from information emerging in the west, was actually the handiwork of Lt. Gen. Peter Walls (rtd), then Lt. Col Peter Walls, a man tasked with the supression of the so-called emergency.

    Walls is world renowned for his counter-intelligence methods which included organising and training sympathetic locals to the British cause, then releasing them to commit atrocities against innocent villagers in the earliest known “hearts and minds campaign”.

    Wall’s unofficial army, the local recruits, were directed by the special forces under his command. They would dress like guerilla’s in non-standard issue gear, distribute pro-communist pamphlets and chant slogans to make their deeds appear consistent with the anti-Communist propaganda of that time. So, survivors would report they were attacked by Chin Peng’s men. And it would make headlines.

    Chin Peng was an ideologue much like PV Sharma whom Lee Kuan Yew banished to Beijing in the early 1960s. The difference is that he was prepared to and did take up arms when excluded from the democratic process. Others willingly laid down and took what they got.

    Chin Peng fought a guerilla war against the British government still embedded in post-colonial Malaya. He was like others who complain today, from even the non-Communist sectors like many Malay [Malaysians], that they were excluded from the supposedly “all inclusive independence talks”.

    The assassination of Sir Henry Gurney is another infamous act attributed to Chin Peng for which the evidence is unclear to hang guilt on the man. It was the 9/11 of its day and all of the “evidence” was so quickly obtained to establish the “fact” that the guilty party was the MCP.

    Peter Walls, who later went on to train and direct the campaign in Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) and South Africa, claimed, admitted and was proved to be the man behind the political assassinations, massacres and other so-called counter intelligence special operations which saw thousands of innocent villagers “suspected of collaboration with the enemy” slaughtered in a most brutal fashion in both these countries.

    Back to Ong Boon Hwa. He satisfies the residency qualification from the admission of the government to his activities, whatever these are, in Malaya for decades. His records from the prestigous Victoria Institution must also be admitted in an affidavit in support of his claim. Additionally it must be borne in mind that the British still hold all documents relating to this man in their meticulous archives on Malaya.

    To banish him is to create a precedent which future leaders will live to regret. The Quran does not recognise sultans, maliks and rajas. In fact, it denounces them. Yet the state in all its proclaimed Islamic glory honours and venerates them.

    We have all come a long way from the witches of Salem. If the South Africans under a most brutal regime of apartheid could find truth and justice in forgiveness and move forward, surely the Malaysian government and the proponents of Islam can do the same and forgive this man in his twilight years. He could well be put on the lecture circuit and impart great knowledge to soldiers, politicians and students of politics in his retirement. He could also put history right and that may well be the factor that drives fear into the hearts of many.

    Isaiah Berlin once said: “Greatness is the ability to turn paradox into platitudes.”

    Have we got it in us?

  13. Edex says

    May 3, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Allowing him to return will hurt many war veterans [who fought] during the communist insurgency. Keep him out of Malaysia. Say “no” to communists.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph