• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Federal Court: Zambry used correct procedure

April 14, 2009

PUTRAJAYA, 14 April 2009: The Federal Court ruled today that Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir and his six state executive councillors had used the right procedure to challenge their suspension from attending the state legislative assembly sittings by speaker V Sivakumar.

The five-member panel led by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff also unanimously held the apex court could hear the constitutional issue on the suspension order.

They dismissed the preliminary objection by Sivakumar’s counsel who argued that the right procedure for Zamby and six others to take up the case was by way of judicial review.

The other judges were Chief Judge of Malaya Datuk Arifin Zakaria and Datuk Nik Hashim Nik Ab Rahman, Datuk S Augustine Paul and Datuk Zulkefli Ahmad Makinuddin.

Zambry and the six executive councillors — Zainol Fadzi Paharuddin, Datuk Ramly Zahari, Hamidah Osman, Datuk Saarani Mohamad, Mohd Zahir Abdul Khalid and Dr Mah Hang Soon — brought the case to the Federal Court pursuant to Article 44 of the Perak State Constitution to seek a declaration that the suspension meted upon them by Sivakumar was null and void.

They initially filed an originating summons at the Ipoh High Court on 2 March, claiming that their suspension (18 months for Zambry and 12 months for the executive councillors) by Sivakumar contravened the state’s constitution.

Earlier, lawyer Sulaiman Abdullah who acted for Sivakumar submitted that the Federal Court had no jurisdiction to hear the merits of the case on the ground the speaker’s decision was non-justiciable.

Under Article 72 of the Perak State Constitution, the validity of any proceedings in the state legislative assembly shall not be questioned in any court, he said.

Citing previous cases, he argued that it was very clear that the decisions made by or in the Federal Parliament or legislative assemblies in the states were immune from judicial challenge.

He said the meaning of “proceedings” in Parliament or state assembly was extremely wide, and anything connected to the affairs of the House was covered by privilege.

Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail who acted as an intervenor in the proceedings, submitted that Article 44 meant that the assembly was not given the power to regulate its own procedure and make the punishment.

He said Zambry’s appointment as Menteri Besar was non-justiciable as the state’s constitution clearly provides for the powers and discretion of the Sultan of Perak.

Sivakumar did not have the power to suspend Zambry and the six executive councillors while the functions of the privilege committee were only to carry out the investigation and pass the motion to the House, he said.

He added that the speaker’s action indirectly was an attempt to defeat the exercise by the Sultan of Perak in appointing Zambry as Menteri Besar.

He also said that the assembly sitting held under a tree on 3 March convened by Sivakumar and the other members was invalid because they failed to obtain a proclamation of the Sultan summoning the assembly.

“Only the Sultan can summon a sitting of the assembly and this is done by the issuance of a proclamation summoning the assembly. Thereafter, such proclamation must be gazetted,” he said.

The submissions on the merits of the application by Zambry and six others will continue on 16 April. &mash; Bernama

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: executive councillor, Federal Court, Perak, Speaker, suspension, V Sivakumar, Zambry Abdul Kadir

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph