• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Flipping on interfaith dialogue (Updated)

[get_post_meta single=1 key="byline"] | January 27, 2010 3 Comments

Updated 5:35pm, 12 Feb 2010

“There is no reason to be afraid of ideas like [having an interfaith body].”

DATUK Seri Rais Yatim, speaking as then culture, arts and heritage minister, when opening a 2005 national conference on establishing an interfaith commission. Rais encouraged everyone to listen to the proposals with an open mind and not to prejudge the discussion.

However, the government subsequently dismissed the proposal following protests from some Muslim groups. (Source: Give interfaith talks a chance, says Rais, Malaysiakini, 24 Feb 2005)

“It was said that Malaysia would have achieved Islamic state status if not for the interference of the colonial masters and the arrival of non-Muslims. Are we now witnessing the regression of our country into a secular state with Islam as a mere ornament?”

Datuk Mustapha Ma, Allied Coordinating Committee of Islamic NGOs (Accin) chairperson, calling for the government to scuttle the interfaith commission idea. (Source: Accin’s statement to the government, 25 Jan 2005)

“I don’t know why this group of people have to carry out activities related to [the interfaith commission]. It is creating unnecessary problems. The government will, in the near future, make an announcement on the Inter-Faith Commission.”

After chairing an Umno supreme council meeting, former party president and Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called for all activities related to the forming of an interfaith commission to cease immediately. Although the government had originally supported the proposal for such a commission, Abdullah said the cabinet decided to postpone it because religious tension in the country had reached a worrying level. (Source: Abdullah: Stop activities on inter-faith issue, New Straits Times, 26 Jul 2006)

“Do not force the government to take action.”

Abdullah, warning the Article 11 coalition, which had held a forum to discuss constitutional issues on the right to freedom of religion. Abdullah said those causing tension in society by organising activities on religious issues should cease their activities. (Source: PM: Stop debate on religious issues, The Star, 28 July 2006)

“It is important that various races in the country hold friendly discussions by delving into Islamic, Christian, Hindu and other religions’ views. We are not converting to other religions but to understand one another’s religious cultures better. That is important.

“I feel that the discussion and understanding of one another’s cultures and religions can enhance harmony. Otherwise, we will continue to live in distrust and prejudice of one another.”

Now Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais, discussing the government’s proposed interfaith dialogue to resolve inter-religious issues such as the recent “Allah” controversy. (Source: Rais: Interfaith dialogue must strive for harmony, The Edge, 19 Jan 2010)

“Malays will see no reason to dialogue as they see themselves as having given up enough already and suspicions will arise that Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon is reviving the Interfaith Council idea. This will not stop the violence. In fact, it may make it worse.”

Umno Youth member Akhramsyah Muammar Ubaidah Sanusi, in a post on his blog. The son of former Agriculture Minister and Kedah Menteri Besar Tan Sri Sanusi Junid said having an interfaith dialogue now would just inflame matters.

He also criticised the government’s donation of RM500,000 to the Metro Tabernacle church after the arson attack on it. He said this would lead to accusations that the government was treating other religions on par with Islam, which he said was the “only religion acknowledged by the constitution”. (Source: Umno Youth member questions Najib’s RM500k donation, The Edge, 11 Jan 2010)

“We don’t need an inter-faith commission. At the moment we don’t feel that it is something necessary. But continuous dialogues among various religious groups — representing Muslim and non-Muslims — could be useful.”

(Updated 5:50pm, 12 Feb 2010) Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, dismissing suggestions for the government to set up an interfaith commission. He said that ongoing closed door dialogues between religious groups were sufficient for the time being to address related issues. (Source: No Plan For Inter-Faith Commission – Muhyiddin, Bernama, 30 Jan 2010) favicon

Read previous Found in Quotation

The Nut Graph needs your support
Please take our five-minute reader survey

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: Found in Quotation Tagged With: Abdullah Badawi, Allah, blog, Found in Quotation, interfaith commission, Malaysia, religion, religious issues, The Star

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. faith04 says

    January 27, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Wolves disguised as sheep, demons clothed in angel outfits […]. Under doctor TDM’ past 22-year rule, Umno successfully acquired “character divisional syndrome” to cover its racist nature.

  2. Main says

    January 27, 2010 at 3:07 pm

    Interfaith dialogues should be done regularly and not only when there are problems. It will enhance understanding.

  3. Hayabusa says

    January 28, 2010 at 10:59 pm

    Well, I can certainly understand why Umno wouldn’t want interfaith dialogues. How can anyone without any balls (or brains) to reason with others yet want others to submit to their view (or rather, their will), have any kind of conversation but monologues?

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2022 The Nut Graph

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.