• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Sedition Act an affront to democracy

By Ragunath Kesavan

March 17, 2009

THE Bar Council is shocked and troubled that the Attorney-General has proceeded to charge Karpal Singh under the Sedition Act 1948 for his statements on the issue of the removal of the Perak Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin by Sultan Azlan Shah and the events that have unfolded in that state.   

The Bar Council has been steadfast in its view that the Act is a draconian and archaic piece of legislation that undermines democratic institutions and is an absolute affront to democracy. Along with other authoritarian and repressive legislation, the Act severely encroaches upon the public enjoyment and exercise of fundamental civil liberties.


(Source: karpalsingh.net)
The prosecution of Karpal, who is also DAP chairperson, will be widely perceived as being selective and an attempt to pacify the partisan calls from certain influential sections within Umno who were pushing for his prosecution. They have even outrageously called for the revocation of his citizenship.

It is abundantly clear that Karpal had only voiced his opinion that the decision of a ruler of a state in this area of constitutional law and practice is justiciable. At no time did he voice disrespect for or challenge the institution of the monarchy in any way. 

True to his calling as an advocate and solicitor, Karpal had, without fear or favour, spoken of the possibility of a legal remedy and not advocated any recourse outside the ambit of our constitution. This is surely permissible under the constitution and cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, amount to sedition.

Many issues of public concern have arisen in the wake of the unprecedented events unfolding in Perak. Legal and public opinion are divided as to what is legally permissible and what is morally right. 

We urge the government to demonstrate its commitment to the rule of law and to democratic processes by encouraging open discourse on issues of concern to the Malaysian public.  

Any attempt to stifle public opinion by resorting to the Act is a sure act of regression that is antithetical to democratic principles.

We strongly urge the government to seriously review the Act with the aim of its eventual total repeal. We are concerned with the series of recent prosecutions against those exercising the freedom of speech, and call for an immediate end to such harassment. 

The charge against Karpal, who is also Member of Parliament for Bukit Gelugor, must be immediately withdrawn.

Ragunath Kesavan
President
Malaysian Bar


See also:
Karpal pleads not guilty to sedition (Updated 3:51pm)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: Letters to the Editor Tagged With: Bar Council, Karpal Singh, letter to the editor, Perak, Ragunath Kesavan, sedition act, sultan

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Damien says

    March 17, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    When did voicing out one’s view and opinion amount to sedition or even verge on an act of treason? This is preposterous!

  2. tengku mohd faizal says

    March 18, 2009 at 1:26 am

    Since “Sedition Act (is) an affront to democracy”, we should then go to MOB democracy, this is what Malaysians like to do, street protest there, street protest here.

    This shows Malaysians LOVE mob democracy. Waiting to see how the Sedition Act will handle mob democracy, probably they will charge all of them and send all of them to jail.
    But then again, that would put thousands and thousands of people in jail, not sure if they can handle that.

  3. Kumar a/l K.Krishnan says

    March 18, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    BN, you have lost my vote.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph