• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Tan Boon Wah sues MACC for illegal detention

July 22, 2009

KUALA LUMPUR, 22 July 2009: Kajang Municipal Councillor Tan Boon Wah today sued the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and two others for allegedly detaining and interrogating him in an unlawful manner last week.

Tan, 39, filed his writ of summons through Messrs Karpal Singh & Co at the registration office of the High Court Appellate and Special Powers Division here at 12:30 pm.

In his writ of summons, Tan, as the plaintiff, named MACC Chief Commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Said Hamdan, Assistant Superintendent Mohammad Hassan Zulkifli, and the MACC as the three defendants.

In his supporting affidavit, the plaintiff claimed that on 15 July, he was taken out of his house by officers of the third defendant to the MACC headquarters in Shah Alam for interrogation at 8:30 pm.

“I was only released at 1:35 pm on the following day, 16 July. This was after I was given an order for interrogation as a witness on 20 July at 10am,” said the plaintiff in his affidavit.

“I had been detained unlawfully by the MACC officers. I had stated that I could not, from the legal aspect, be interrogated after government office hours, that is, from 8:30am until 5pm daily, as provided under Section 30(1)(a) of the MACC Act,” the plaintiff said.

Subsequently, the plaintiff claimed the move was an unlawful detention, which resulted in him suffering losses and damages.

Through the writ of summons, the plaintiff demanded a court declaration that the defendants, who were investigating under Section 30(1)(a) of the MACC Act 2009, could only record statements from the plaintiff as a witness during office hours only, that is from 8:30am until 5:30pm.

The plaintiff also demanded a declaration order that all the defendants had acted against the provision of Section 30 (3)(a) of the Act, damages for unlawful detention, costs and other reliefs from the court.

Tan is one of several people who were called up by the MACC to give statements in investigations on alleged misappropriation of the Selangor state allocation.

A political aide to one of the Selangor state executive councillors, Teoh Beng Hock, who was called up for interrogation by the MACC at its headquarters on the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, was found dead on the fifth floor of the building on 16 July. — Bernama

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Nicholas Aw says

    July 23, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Good for you Tan Boon Wah. The MACC should be taught a lesson. I don’t deny that there are some very dedicated officers but generally the MACC is a big bully legally sanctioned by the BN government.

    They investigate selectively […] and they act as if they are God. They allow people like Lingam, Khir Toyo and Zakaria Darus to walk about freely; the latter in the next world, and yet go all out to investigate Teoh Beng Hock, Tan Boon Wah and other opposition politicians.

  2. Gopal Raj Kumar says

    July 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm

    This gets even better. Now this chap is suing, seeking relief for losses and damages. Why can’t his lawyers or the reporter who wrote the story produce specifics. Damages in what respect and losses [in] what capacity?

    There is no description of the basis […] [for which his] detention [is] rendered […] illegal. What information can be obtained out of this illegality is not necessarily inadmissible. If there was a need for him to be detained then it may have been in the public interest that he [was] detained […].

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph