• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

What use, that cabinet order?

By Deborah Loh

May 7, 2010

“Conversion is not a grounds for the automatic dissolution of a marriage. The children should be brought up in the common religion. For the spouse who intends to convert into Islam, he or she would also have to come clean…The convert would have to fulfil his or her marriage responsibilities according to civil laws prior to the conversion.”

MINISTER in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz on the cabinet’s decision that a spouse who converts to Islam cannot unilaterally change his or her children’s religion. The offspring are to be raised in the common religion of both parents prior to the conversion.

The cabinet took this stand after the media highlighted the case of M Indira Gandhi whose husband converted their three children to Islam without her consent. While Indira Gandhi’s case is one of several similar custody cases involving unilateral conversions, it drew public attention because she was still breastfeeding the youngest child who had been taken away by her husband. (Source: ‘Children of divorced parents must be raised in original religion’, The Star, 23 April 2009)

“I’m not 100% sure what was announced will work. I won’t believe it until their names are changed back to what it used to be and they are declared Hindus.”

Indira Gandhi expressing doubt over the enforceability of the cabinet position against conversions of minors. In March 2010, the Ipoh High Court ordered her husband to return the youngest child but he did not comply and has also filed a stay application against the court order. (Source: ‘Children of divorced parents must be raised in original religion’, The Star, 23 April 2009)

“Will this be a judgment in futility? Why don’t we listen to this case when they return….Isn’t this a political or social problem?… If the judgment cannot be enforced then it will only be a paper judgment.”

Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi, in an exchange with lawyers in the Federal Court which was meant to hear the constitutional questions on child conversions in the case of S Shamala. Shamala’s ex-husband Muhamad Ridzwan Abdullah converted to Islam after their civil marriage, and then converted their two sons unilaterally. Shamala and the boys fled from the country after the High Court in 2004 quashed her attempt to nullify the conversions. She is now in contempt of the High Court’s order to produce her children in court, which Zaki used as reason for the Federal Court not to hear the constitutional questions. He has asked for time for the court to decide whether to proceed.

Meanwhile, Indira Gandhi‘s attempt to quash her children’s conversions is left hanging as a result, since the Ipoh High Court had also decided to wait for the Federal Court’s decision on the constitutional questions in Shamala’s case. And the cabinet’s order to stop unilateral conversions of minors remains an empty promise. (Source: Federal Court puts child conversion case on pause mode, The Edge Financial Daily, 4 May 2010)

Read other Found in Quotation

The Nut Graph
needs your support

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: Found in Quotation Tagged With: Cabinet, children Muslim, conversion, Deborah Loh, Found in Quotation, islam, ministers, nazri, politics, quotes, rights, They Said It, unilateral

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph